ADDITIONAL NEWS ABOUT ZIM!!
"WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RULE OF LAW IN ZIMBABWE???"
|
Powered byIP2Location.com
NB: THIS IS NOT THE HOME PAGE!!!
About Me
Blog Archive
Thursday, 25 February 2010
"THE CORRUPT ROLE OF NGOs, DONORS AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE ZIMBABWEAN CRISIS!" by PAUL RUMEMA CHIMHOSWA
(Trading The Soul of The Change Movement for Pieces of Silver)
By Paul Rumema Chimhosva
3 February 2009
INTRODUCTION
The Franklin Pierce Law Center in its IP Mall: Traditional Knowledge publications define Civil Society as follows:
“Civil society refers to the arena of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market are often complex, blurred and negotiated. Civil society commonly embraces a diversity of spaces, actors and institutional forms, varying in their degree of formality, autonomy and power. Civil societies are often populated by organisations such as registered charities, development non-governmental organisations, community groups, women's organisations, faith-based organisations, professional associations, trades unions, self-help groups, social movements, business associations, coalitions and advocacy group.”
The same publications also define the concept of a non-governmental organisation as follows:
“A non-profit making, voluntary, service-oriented/development oriented organization, either for the benefit of members (a grassroots organization) or of other members of the population (an agency). (World Bank). A non-profit group or association organized outside of institutionalized political structures to realize particular social objectives such as environmental protection or serve particular constituencies (such as indigenous peoples). NGO activities range from research, information distribution, training, local organization, and community service to legal advocacy, lobbying for legislative change, and civil disobedience. NGO's range in size from small groups within a particular community to huge membership groups with a national or international scope. [UNEP]”
It is important to define what exactly is civil society and what is a non-governmental organisation (NGO) is so that the following analysis of the interaction between the political organisations in Zimbabwe and these formations can be truly unraveled. It is important to note also that the MDC is a political formation which now finds itself in government and with the real possibility of being the governing party in the not too distant future, if their own predictions are to be believed.
Zimbabwe as a nation has just (30 years) come out of one of the most protracted wars of independence the earth has ever seen. I use the word just very deliberately as it is now some 70 years after the holocaust and the Jewish people are still tracking down and punishing their oppressors something that black Africans have long been discouraged by various forms of persuasion including corrupt payments to existing and emerging African leadership. Estimates vary from 30000 to 50000 people who died during the liberation struggle. The population of Zimbabwe holds its sovereignty so dearly, close to its heart, that it is disheartening that a Robert Mugabe or a Tsvangirai uses national sovereignty as a political football. The donor community has used civil society and NGOs in Zimbabwe for a variety of purposes all of which serve interests other than those of Zimbabweans.
The operative words in the definitions of civil society and NGOs are voluntary, service- oriented, development, shared interest and values, and most importantly non-profit. These organisations can take the form of grassroot organisations with members being the focus of value migration from donors to the intended beneficiaries (the ordinary citizens).
OBJECTIVES OF CIVIL SOCIETY AND NGOs in ZIMBABWE
The strategic objectives of civil society and NGOs in an effort to transmit value to the down-trodden population of Zimbabwe should embrace advocacy for constitutional reform and organizing peaceful resistance to repression and other forms of restriction of individual and societal liberties. The quest for a new people driven constitution in Zimbabwe is central to this objective. The freedom to choose a leadership that is responsive to the people’s needs should be a fundamental objective of civil society and NGO backed revolutionary crusade. The crafting of a national vision and value system coupled to a people driven transformational agenda should be the focus of not only the change movement by of all donors, civil society and NGOs. The rule of law is not only achieved whilst in government but it is also demonstrated during the period of the struggle for people’s power. Therefore it is common cause that civil society should demand of its components total transparency and accountability both in actions and in the distribution of resources. Zanu PF and Robert Mugabe have failed the people of Zimbabwe mainly because there were no democratic structures to hold them accountable to the people of Zimbabwe. The Zimbabwean parliament has always been a rubber stamp for Zanu PF and its president, there was never any debate apart from eulogising Mugabe as the second Christ. The objective therefore should be to foster a culture of constructive dissent. There should be a culture of transparency in the lead up to the inevitable change from the Mugabe regime. Civil society and NGOs should demand of those who seek to rule Zimbabwe in the near future to embrace the culture of accountability and transparency.
In the light of the above discussion an attempt will now be made to highlight some of the failures of civil society and NGOs and why they should now be discouraged to further undermine the struggle of the Zimbabwean people.
INDIVIDUAL ENRICHMENT
The donor community has accepted the classic definitions of civil society and NGOs and applied it to Zimbabwe as if Zimbabwe was a normal society. The concept of voluntarism does not exist in the context of the chaotic Zimbabwean socio-economic environment. Most entrepreneurial and sharp academic brains in Zimbabwe could not find employment in the public sector or the non-existent private sector. The only available foreign currency based entrepreneurial activity was the NGO and Civil Society sector. Instead of being a voluntary service oriented non-profit sector this sector graduated into a huge profit based industry whose source of competitive advantage was the speed at which the organisations could wood wink unsuspecting western donors into parting with their taxpayers’ funds. The end result has been the betrayal of the reason why civil society and NGOs exist, which is to garner socio-politico-economic value on behalf of an oppressed people.
There is not one leader in the change movement whose individual net worth has not dramatically improved since the escalation of the Zimbabwean crisis with the formation of the MDC in 1999. Granted, Zanu PF has been looting state coffers and development aid for the past 30 years. It cannot be said to be right that corruption is justifiable as long as it is not done by Mugabe. Civil society, the donor community and NGOs need to realize that very little of what they have donated have reached the people of Zimbabwe. The leaders of opposition parties have their children at private schools and universities abroad on the very same resources made to facilitate the struggle of the Zimbabwean people. Leaders in the so-called unity government who have never been gainfully employed in their lives now boast luxury German sedans and a multitude of luxurious suburban houses. These so-called leaders have holiday houses in places like Cape Town and other exotic places around the globe. People based in Zimbabwe, selling out on the people’s struggle, have set themselves businesses in Botswana and South Africa. So- called human rights campaigners on behalf of Zimbabwe, like Eleanor Sisulu of South Africa, have enriched themselves no end. It is a real shame that people who do not understand the struggle of the Zimbabwean people have gone out and got monetary resources on behalf of Zimbabweans and have enriched themselves to obscene levels.
The MDC and the democratic change forces in Zimbabwe got AU$15million from the Australian government, US$5million and 30million British pounds in 2008 to contest the Zimbabwe general elections. These are public figures that Howard, Bush and Blair gloated about as funds necessary to facilitate the demise of the Mugabe regime. In late
2009 Tsvangirai failed to settle a hotel lunch bill in Masvingo. Printers and others support services for campaign support for the MDC were paid late. Simba Makoni abused party vehicles, fuel and funds using them for personal gain. The west has donated a vast
amount of money to the constitution making process where the leaders of that process are pocketing copious amounts of money. The Zimbabwean crisis has long lost its value as the epitomy of the struggle for freedom of the oppressed masses of Zimbabwe but a very vibrant self-enrichment programme for donor sharks based in Zimbabwe, US, South Africa, Botswana, Canada, New Zealand and other countries.
Individuals who cannot provide any meaningful contribution to humanity have found themselves a very lucrative pastime: crying crocodile tears on behalf of the people of Zimbabwe and getting paid for it. A simple audit of estates of the individuals who lead all these mushrooming Zimbabwe crisis NGOs should show the donors how much of their investments actually reach the people of Zimbabwe. A huge chunk of their donations are destined for the pockets of the few and not the people. One would like to be introduced to any poor NGO functionary involved with the Zimbabwean crisis.
BREEDING A GENERATION OF BRAIN DEAD WESTERN FUNCTIONARIES
Whilst civil society and NGOs, together with the donors, think they are getting rid of the rot Mugabe has visited upon Zimbabwe they need to be aware that they have started breeding a far more corrupt culture in the ranks of the change movement. Money is changing hands midnight and no auditing of the movement’s accounts is done. This culture is going to be transferred into the Zimbabwean fiscus. Already elements of that are beginning to emerge with the introduction of corrupt language like “takiya kiya – we have made a plan” or “nhasi haulume – you are not eating” from the Finance Minister on serious matters of national resources distribution. This comes from the culture that civil society and NGOs is inculcating into the Zimbabwean political leadership. The culture that’s says: you do not have to account for anything to anyone. I am deeply disappointed with the complicity with which donors dish out resources in the name of the common Zimbabwean and then fail to hold people accountable for those resources.
It can be argued that auditing of the movement’s account may open up the movement to Zanu PF propaganda tactics, but how do you let the people know what you have done with the resources meant for them? What effective programme has the MDC done for the people of Zimbabwe except using the people to access power for personal benefit? The whole issue about the outstanding issues is about jobs for pals and nothing to do with the real change mandate. The change movement mandate was very simple: get a new people driven constitution, get free and fair elections and implement a democratic transformational agenda to have a better life for the ordinary Zimbabwean. These issues are not even on the outstanding issues list; they are there by inference if at all.
The preceding argument against transparency is not convincing. The more plausible explanation is that these NGOS and civil society are well aware that there is misuse of resources by the change movement functionaries. This is kept low as leverage to later champion an agenda that keeps Zimbabwe in check in case the Zimbabwean people would want to keep issues such as land distribution and economic liberation on the agenda. These issues cannot be a success in Zimbabwe in case Africa catches a fire, a revolutionary fire. The idea then is to lure the current leadership into the evil web of corruption and blackmail presenting Zimbabwe with a mirage of progressive democratic leadership yet the manufacturing process of a brain dead crop of compromised leadership is well and truly underway. It cannot be that civil society, NGOs and donors are not
aware of the abuse of donor funds by leaders of the change movement. Clearly this is an investment whose return is the ability to produce a malleable and docile leadership amenable to compromising the revolutionary transformational change agenda necessary for a democratic and prosperous Zimbabwe. No organisation will wantonly throw resources at a process from which it does not gain. The Zimbabwean nation must rise to the realization that a political dummy is being sold to the nation.
PART OF THE NON-DEMOCRATIC HISTORY OF ZIMBABWE
Donor nations and organisations that participate in the nurturing of this corrupt leadership should bear in mind that they are entrenching themselves deeply in the annals of Zimbabwean history as farmers of corruption and non-democratic tendencies. Their inability to report people who abuse the resources meant for the Zimbabwean people has meant that the name of Zimbabweans has been fraudulently abused for the benefit of a few. There are people who, and organisations which, will not be able to survive should Zimbabweans have a stable and prosperous nation. Where will organisations like Crisis Coalition of Zimbabwe and the flamboyant Eleanor Sisulu be if Zimbabweans are at peace? The same people could not hold Morgan Tsvangirai to account as he is seen, in the NGO community and civil society, as a source of donor funds. The only survival strategy that these organisations know of is that of remaining in Tsvangirai good books. It is common knowledge that once Tsvangirai or the MDC labels an organisation or individual Zanu PF, political extinction becomes but a reality. This is the reason why the dictatorship tendencies evident in the MDC today are a foretaste of what’s to come should it be a reality that indeed the MDC is in power.
CONCLUSION
That Mugabe and his regime should be removed is common cause. What should never be a consideration for Zimbabwe is to allow evil of the same or even worse magnitude, as what has been experienced in the last 30 years, to take root again. Civil society, non-governmental organisations and the donor community have let themselves and Zimbabwe down. These parties will forever be seen as having prolonged the suffering of Zimbabweans and having been facilitators of a succession plan for a dictatorship; they are breeding as sizeable pool of corrupt, inconsiderate, incompetent, affluent and insensitive successors to Robert Mugabe.
Thursday, 09 April 2009
OPEN LETTER TO THE THEN PRES G W BUSH!!!

http://www.zimdaily.com/news/bush27.5007.html
also posted at http://bobchargesheet.blogspot.com/2008/05/open-letter-to-pres-g-w-bush-from-rev.html
and http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=500&Itemid=26
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
My name is Rev Mufaro Stig Hove. I am a Zimbabwean citizen by descent and I am also a South African Citizen by birth.
My father, a Shona from Zimbabwe (then Rhodesia) married my mother (a Zulu from Natal) in January, 1956 and I was born at Dundee, Natal, RSA in October, 1956.
They went to Rhodesia in 1958 and I grew up there to manhood.
I have decided to live in South Africa since 2006 and have formally taken up my South African Citizenship because I could no longer live freely in Zimbabwe, the country I have so loved and have grown up in from the said 1958 to the said 2006.
I have written a lot about the true situation in my beloved land and the very reason why I decided to write was so that all those who want to know the truth can read for themselves and get it from the proverbial "horse's mouth."
I run a conglomerate of blogs and the Index one being www.zimfinalpush.blogspot.com
For obvious reasons, I have never set foot on Zimbabwean soil since I left in August, 2006.
MY APPEAL, YOUR EXCELLENCY!
Your Excellency, Robert Gabriel Mugabe is a very evil, arrogant and cunning character. I will follow my knowledge and interaction with him from as far back as 1973.
I will provide links to articles that I (and a few others) have written and which were picked up and re-published on various other sites and a simple "google-search" of my names or the titles of my submissions can reveal the extent of my "influence".
The purpose of this, my humble letter to you, Your Excellency, is to dispel and correct a lot of propaganda items that certain well-placed persons like Mr Thabo Mvuyelwa Mbeki (State President of the Republic of South Africa) may desperately try to ventilate.
I have been presently motivated by news that he is understood to have written a four-page letter to Yourself, Your Excellency. Although we are not aware of the full contents of the said letter, we understand he castigated you using numerous exclamation marks for he what he calls your "meddling" in Zimbabwe's affairs.
Allow me to give you the full story of the Zimbabwean affairs in question, Your Excellency!I wrote an Open Letter to Mr Robert Gabriel Mugabe ( who has illegitimately presided over Zimbabwe's for the past seven years) and I asked him to explain the deaths in mysterious (mainly) car accidents of numerous of Zimbabwe's cream of heroes.
As a very dedicated ZANU-PF cadre up till 2003, I was aware of these assassinations and I ask Mr Robert Mugabe to respond to that letter for the benefit of the whole world.
I was Secretary of ZANU-PF at District level and we wrecked havoc and killed ZAPU members in Kadoma during the dark days of "GUKURAHUNDI" and I've written extensively on these evil activities and my perspective of how these things happened and I invite you, Your Excellency, to read my submission, "The Thoughts and Memories of a Former ZANU-PF Cadre" and the posting thereof is available at http://zimfinalpush1.blogspot.com/2007/03/memories-and-thoughts-of-former-zanu-pf.html
It is well known that on the 16th of June, 1984 the small farming and mining town of Kadoma (formerly Gatooma) was subjected to ZANU-PF mob-rule which left a trail of burnt houses, destroyed and-of looted furniture and dead and unburied bodies on innocent PF-ZAPU members. I recalled the events of that day that submission.
A fellow activist, Joseph Tanonoka Whande wrote a very revealing article on why Mr Robert Mugabe can never retire even if he wanted to. I posted this submission at http://chinja.blogspot.com/2007/08/mugabe-cannot-retire-even-if-he-wants.html
Although he is a dubious character, Professor Jonathan Moyo also wrote a very intelligent analysis of the dangers we face as a Nation as Mr Robert Mugabe precariously clings to power at a shameful age of 84. I posted this article at http://zimfinalpush2.blogspot.com/2007/06/death-of-robert-mugabethe-tragedy-ahead.html
I also wrote a submission along the same lines and I entitled it "IS THE NATION OF ZIMBABWE READY FOR THE EARTHLY DEPARTURE OF ITS 'FATHER'?" (http://zimfinalpush8.blogspot.com/2007/12/is-nation-of-zimbabwe-ready-for-earthly.html
I wrote a very detailed submission on how WE RIGGED ELECTIONS in Zimbabwe. I wrote as one that participated in the evil processes and not as a visiting journalist. I can give an Interview on the things that I wrote in that submission.
(http://zimgossiper.blogspot.com/2007/04/full-submission-on-rigging-of-zim.html
(http://dearmrthabombeki.blogspot.com/2007/07/thabo-mbeki-s-proverbial-long-rope.html
(http://zimfinalpush8.blogspot.com/2007/12/why-sadcmbeki-initiative-cannot-and.html
A very respected Media person and Torch-bearer who has suffered untold hardships because of his commitment to Democracy for Zimbabwe ( and indeed for the whole of Africa and beyond): Mr Trevor Ncube who makes it possible for Zimbabweans and the world to get the true and fuller picture of the situation prevailing in Zimbabwe wrote a very lengthy article on the choices facing Mr Robert Mugabe. I posted this article at http://radicalzim.blogspot.com/2007/03/violent-or-peaceful-exit-for-robert_27.html
Last but not least, Your Excellency, there are numerous voices from the grave. Dr Joshua M N Nkomo who was the founder of the Liberation Struggle in Zimbabwe died a broken man. He left us his own perception of events as they unfolded in the 80s.
He wrote a Letter to the then Prime Minister Robert Gabriel Mugabe and it is self-explanatory. I posted it together with numerous other articles relevant to the dark era of the so-called "GUKURAHUNDI". (http://gukurahundi.blogspot.com/2007/04/full-letter-from-dr-j-m-n-nkomo-to.html
Your Excellency let me not belabour you with information. Robert Gabriel Mugabe is a despicable crook and gangster who deserves neither Mercy nor Diplomacy.
He must be removed swiftly and even violently to save the sinking, suffering nation! Please under no circumstances should you be side-tracked by the likes of President Thabo Mvuyelwa Mbeki. The issue is not about land: the majority of the so-called redistributed land went to a few ZANU-PF "heavyweights" and Mugabe's sisters' children.
The issue is not about black pride: Mugabe is hiding an evil murderer who wrecked havoc in Ethiopia and brutally took the life of HIS IMPERIAL MAJESTY HAILLE SELLASE (RAS TAFARI). Mugabe deserves no honourable place in History. Whoever would bring him down to size would be the Hero all of us are looking for!
PLEASE ASSIST THE DEMOCRATIC FORCES TO GET INTO POWER AND SORT OUT THE MESS LEFT BY THE DEFEATED FAILED ZANU-PF MAFIA REGIME.
I thank you for your time to attend to, this my humble letter.
Yours faithfully,
Rev Mufaro Stig Hove.
www.zimfinalpush.blogspot.com |
Thursday, 24 January 2008
"Mbeki should admit he has failed" Rose Maindiseka

LINK!!!!
Just before the latest collapse of talks between the ruling ZANU PF and the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), South African President Thabo Mbeki was characteristically upbeat about the prospects of the two sides signing a final agreement to set the scene for the staging of free and fair elections within the next two months.
Mbeki was reported to have told visiting Irish prime minister Bertie Ahern about a week before flying to Harare last Friday that he was “within days” of getting the two parties to sign a deal to end the crisis in Zimbabwe. Following meetings with President Robert Mugabe and the leaders of the two factions of the MDC, Morgan Tsvangirai and Arthur Mutambara, Mbeki was equally positive about the progress that was being made.
It, however, emerged soon afterwards that the talks had collapsed because of Mugabe’s refusal to accommodate opposition demands for a new constitution to be in place before the elections and for the polls to be postponed so that any agreed changes to media, security and electoral laws would be enforced to the satisfaction and benefit of all stakeholders well ahead of the electoral process.
Over the years, Mbeki has been in the habit of predicting “breakthroughs” in the Zimbabwean crisis that have never materialized and that in fact have heralded major failures for him as peace broker. Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern is not the first head of state to be given an over-optimistic prognosis on the Zimbabwean crisis during a state visit to South Africa. Four years ago, United States President George Bush was given a similarly rosy impression when Mbeki informed the American leader that a lot was happening behind the scenes and a breakthrough was imminent. Shortly afterwards, then German chancellor, Gerhard Schroeder, who visited South Africa in 2004, was told the same story.
Mbeki once publicly gave June, 2004 as the deadline by which he would announce a resolution of the differences between the opposition and Zanu-PF, heralding the end of the political crisis. Needless to say, his predictions came to naught. Not only was the impasse not broken but that year Mbeki washed his hands of the crisis and announced that only the people of Zimbabwe would have to put their heads together to confront their problems. No one, not even South Africa could “import” a solution to Zimbabwe, Mbeki stressed.
However, despite publicly throwing in the towel on this occasion, Mbeki eagerly accepted appointment by the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) in March last year to act as mediator once more. Over the past year of acting as SADC mediator in Zimbabwe , Mbeki has characteristically stuck to the same muddled approach that resulted in spectacular failure during the years when he touted “quiet diplomacy” as the best way to deal with Zimbabwe ’s wily octogenarian president. He continued to raise false hopes and to over-estimate the efficacy of his hands-off skills as a mediator.
In August last year, he gave an upbeat briefing to the SADC summit held in Lusaka about the progress he had made in bringing Zanu-PF and the MDC to the negotiating table. But as is now clear, this latest mission has gone nowhere and there are no prospects for breaking the logjam and bringing relief to the suffering people of Zimbabwe through a negotiated solution. The question to ask is whether Mbeki’s dismal performance stems from poor judgment or sheer lack of concern about the plight of the people of Zimbabwe.
In the past, his defenders have argued that Mbeki’s “quiet diplomacy” was the only approach that was likely to bear fruit as opposed to the West’s hard-line public condemnation of Mugabe and his government. These defenders of Mbeki’s lacklustre performance claimed that adopting a more robust stance on Zimbabwe would merely promote Western prejudices about Africans being unfit or unable to run their own affairs.
But after the many years of non-delivery of results under “quiet diplomacy” and a year of stagnation under the SADC initiative, it is time for Mbeki to do the honourable thing and admit he has not brought enough leadership, goodwill and diplomatic skills to his role as mediator to make a difference. This lack of progress in fact to lends credence to accusations by critics that the South African leader has colluded with the Mugabe government all along.
In the latest exercise, Mbeki who only stirs into action when he is due to brief his SADC counterparts, has demonstrated a propensity for leaning heavily only on the opposition to make concessions without exerting similar pressures on the ruling party to address glaring governance and other shortcomings. Last week, Mugabe gloated that there was no progress in the talks because the opposition was simply not ready for elections and needed an excuse to chicken out.
The opposition is of course not ready for the polls because it has been prevented from holding rallies, to mobilizing support and campaigning freely throughout the country. It has been thwarted at every turn. The two MDC factions do not enjoy access to the official media in which opposition politicians are only featured when they are being attacked or mocked. These unjustified tirades and the subjection of opposition and civic leaders to police brutality are some of the issues on which Mbeki as the mediator should have spoken out. Pointing out the urgent need to end state-sponsored violence, the political persecution of opposition figures and to restore the rule of law does not represent vilification and demonization of Mugabe as Mbeki and other African leaders have dishonestly claimed.
It is no secret that Mbeki and other African leaders within SADC and the African Union are hamstrung by their belief that dealing with their Zimbabwean counterpart more honestly by getting him to face his blunders and abuses would be playing into the hands of Western powers such as the United States and Britain. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, African leaders have continued to attribute all the problems in Zimbabwe today to the fact that the British government reneged on undertakings to finance the land reform programme.
Even granting that this argument may have once been true, it no longer makes sense to use it to explain the dire situation prevailing in Zimbabwe now. The government of President Mugabe decided in 2000 to go it alone on land redistribution and proceeded to violently seize farms from whites. The government now resorts to citing the former colonial power’s failure to keep its promise because the land reform exercise has been an absolute disaster.
It has failed to take off in eight years and chaos and corruption continue to be the order of the day. Foreign powers can surely not be blamed for the violent and disorderly manner in which the matter was handled. They are not responsible for the allocation of prime land to cronies and friends who have failed dismally to utilize the resource resulting in endless food shortages and a disastrous impact on the economy. Mbeki and other African leaders know this but choose to sweep it under the carpet in the name of solidarity.
After a visit to Zimbabwe last year to assess the country’s economic crisis, SADC Executive Secretary, Tomaz Salomao, submitted a report calling for political and legal reforms and an overhaul of the civil service. This report, based the situation on the ground, reflects Zimbabwe’s continual descent into lawlessness, political tyranny and rampant corruption, which cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be the result of Western machinations. But as long as African leaders are blinded by their need to demonstrate solidarity with the Mugabe government in its supposed fight with the West, they will continue to betray the people of Zimbabwe as Mbeki has done over the years
Mbeki’s opaque dealings with Mugabe have enabled the Zimbabwean leader to buy time and consolidate his dictatorship. Beyond that, the South African leader and SADC should accept that he has failed dismally to deliver as an impartial and honest peace broker. The effect of his involvement has been to prolong the suffering of Zimbabweans and to hasten the disintegration of the economy. Mbeki, who is distracted by his own political problems in South Africa, should now let others have ago.
It is perhaps time for SADC and the African Union to reconsider a proposal made by Senegalese president Abdoulaye Wade two months ago that a panel of African leaders should be constituted to deal with the wily Mugabe. After the latest Mbeki debacle, it is time for African leaders to remove their blinkers and for once, do what is right for the people of Zimbabwe.
@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@
On the contrary, Thabo Mbeki has succeeded
LINK!!!
President Thabo Mbeki has not failed over his mediation in Zimbabwe, suggested in the article yesterday (January 24) by Rose Maindiseka.
This might sound illogical but this is the truth. Mbeki's aim was to achieve something for his god-father President Robert Mugabe and he has succeeded. Mbeki wanted to buy time for Mugabe. He has managed that. He wanted to dupe the progressive world into thinking he was doing something about the Zimbabw crisis. He has achieved that.
He did not want to achieve any real progress and, indeed, no progress has been achieved.
Lucas Mbambo
Thursday, 15 November 2007
Panic in Mugabe's bunker: Dictator losing grip???


The First Post's exclusive reports of Robert Mugabe's plots- first to assassinate his critics, including ex-Archbishop Pius Ncube, then to destroy Ncube with charges of sexual misconduct - have enraged Zimbabwe's President.
But publication has caused him temporarily to call off the conspiracies.
Scenes reminiscent of the last days of Hitler were witnessed at a late-night meeting at State House, called by Mugabe on Monday.
The President raved and screamed at his top security men, threatening to sack some of them, including Central Intelligence Organisation boss Happyton Bonyongwe, unless they put a stop to the damaging leaks.
Bonyongwe confessed to the president that the latest plots against Ncube , which were attempting to link the former Catholic Archbishop of Bulawayo with false charges of sodomy, adultery and deliberately spreading Aids, had all fallen apart, thanks to The First Post's reports. Several of those lined up to make accusations against Ncube had already disappeared.
Mugabe, frothing with rage, screamed at the hapless chief: "Get out of the kitchen if you cannot handle it, Bonyongwe. Since when have you failed to handle your boys? Or maybe you are one of those that think I should leave my job." Then he ordered a visibly shaken Bonyongwe to call off the anti-Ncube campaign for the moment, and instead launch a manhunt to track down the informants who gave information
to The First Post - and "deal with them first."
The government has been unable to pass off the reports about the Ncube honeytrap and the attempts on his life and reputation as fiction, because The First Post showed documents about the plans, passed to me at great risk by my sources.
Mugabe has now ordered that in future there must be no paperwork about such plots, and all briefings must be made strictly by telephone or in person, face to face.
The Monday night meeting was at the highest level of government. It included, apart from Bonyongwe, the defence forces commander General Constantine Chiwengwa, the army chief Phillip Sibanda, air force chief Perence Shiri, police commissioner Augustine Chirhuri, and the home and defence ministers, Kembo Mohadi and Sydney Sekeramayi.
Significantly absent was Security Minister Didymus Mutasa, who is out of favour because of his involvement with the 'magic diesel' affair.
When I spoke to Pius Ncube yesterday I warned him that the hiatus in the attacks on his reputation was only temporary. He told me: "I am not worried. I have said before that I only fear God, and Mugabe is not God. I will continue to fight for a better life in Zimbabwe."
LINK!!!!!